|
|
Cogeneration, the path to profit.
by Research Dept., Sugarudyog.com ABSTRACT Cogeneration is the simultaneous production of power and heat - usually in the form of electricity and steam. Benefits are much higher fuel efficiency and lower environmental load compared with the levels achievable with purchased electricity and independent steam generation. With solid fuels, high pressure steam is usually raised in a boiler and passed through a turbine to generate power. The low pressure turbine exhaust steam is then available for process heating. With liquid and gaseous fuels, it is also possible to run a reciprocating or gas turbine engine to generate power from the hot pressurised gases and then recover exhaust heat for process use. The characteristics and economics of some available technologies are briefly reviewed, together with the opportunities for improvement. Some examples of cogeneration in the chemical industry are provided, with an overview of other possible application areas in Australia. INTRODUCTION Many commercial and industrial activities have a simultaneous need for power and for heating or cooling to operate their processes, store their products and maintain comfortable working conditions for employees. Conventionally, electricity would be supplied by a distribution company from remote, large power stations through an extensive, and expensive, high voltage transmission and low voltage distribution network. Heating could also be supplied by electricity or by on-site fuel combustion in a boiler, raising steam. Cooling can be provided by local mechanical refrigeration or absorption refrigeration utilising either additional power or heat input. Alternatively, a local COGENERATION scheme could be used whereby useful heat and power is produced sequentially from the same energy source. The idea is an old one - certainly dating back to the earliest engine drivers, who cheerfully cooked their lunch and brewed their tea on the boiler while attending to the power needs of the mine or mill! By the end of the 19th Century, cogeneration schemes were common in the heavy end of metallurgical and chemical processes, and in ships engine rooms. In early applications, the "power" would be taken as shaft power, and the "heat" as steam or hot water. With the development of electrical technology, the "power" element increasingly came to be produced as electrical power for improved flexibility of use. Heat output is still commonly recovered and distributed as steam. However there are many applications where hot water - or hot gas is used. Of course, the development of refrigeration technology allows either power - through mechanical refrigeration, or heat - through absorption refrigeration to be used to generate cold. Cogeneration schemes need to be tailored to the particular user demands and considerable professional expertise is needed to understand and meet all requirements in a satisfactory way. Over recent years, there has been a resurgence in interest in cogeneration, driven by:
OPPORTUNITIES FOR COGENERATION There is an opportunity for Cogeneration when there is a simultaneous requirement for power and heat. Modern schemes can have considerable flexibility in the ratio of power to heat provided and may be configured to meet the usual electrical load requirement - with supplementary and standby power from the grid, and with supplementary heat from additional boilers. Meeting the cyclic demands of large batch processes is awkward - cogeneration sits most comfortably with continuous processes or activities with relatively steady demands. A fuel or fuels need to be available, competitive with the delivered cost of essentially coal-based electricity. Understanding the economics of a cogeneration proposal is difficult at present, due to uncertainty in the future electricity and gas tariffs. This is a considerable stumbling block. A further issue, we will briefly return to, is the legal and contractual complexity of out-sourced cogeneration power and steam supplies from utility facilities established to serve several industrial or commercial customers. COGENERATION TECHNOLOGY In all the broad sweep of possible approaches to Cogeneration, there are three main avenues:
These will be briefly overviewed in turn. Topping Cycles Here power is produced prior to the recovery of useful residual thermal energy. Within these topping cycles, experience teaches that the best way depends on the qualities of the fuel available. For dirty fuels - whether solid, liquid or gas, it is usual practice to burn the fuel in a boiler to produce high pressure steam, then let the HP steam down to lower pressure in a steam turbine which extracts power, and finally to recover the turbine exhaust steam for heating duties. This method allows the power turbo machinery to work in a clean steam environment, keeping the fuel and ash problems confined to the boiler and stack systems. Examples of this way of working may be found:
Boilers are highly developed and well understood. Usually it is possible to capture more than 85% of the lower heating value of the fuel as high pressure steam energy. Depending on the scale of operations, steam pressure ratios, steam conditions, and turbine details, some 15-25% of the HP steam energy can be extracted as power. The balance is available in the LP turbine exhaust steam. Thus the Cogeneration system can capture 85% of the fuel heating value, compared with remote electricity generation from coal, where delivered efficiency is unlikely to exceed 35%. When the fuel is a clean liquid or gas, it may be burnt directly in an engine to produce power, and the waste heat from engine cooling and exhaust may be recovered for use as hot water, steam or directly as hot gas. Smaller systems up to about 1 MW electrical commonly use reciprocating gas or diesel engines. Gas turbines are available in sizes from 200 kW up to 200 MW in a single unit. These machines typically produce exhaust gases at about 500oC at high load, and it is common to recover much of this energy with a Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) fitted into the exhaust ducting. Usually 80% of the fuel lower heating value can be recovered as shaft power or heat with these systems. Reciprocating engines have some additional losses or thermal outputs which are not economic to recover, while gas turbine engines with HRSGs have higher stack losses than conventional boilers. Reciprocating engines can give up to 30% of the fuel LHV as shaft power, while modern gas turbines can now achieve more than 40%. Means have been developed for improving the power/steam flexibility of the gas turbine/HRSG system. Where additional and/or higher pressure steam is required, this can be raised by supplementary firing of additional fuel in the exhaust duct at the inlet to the HRSG. Fuel conversion to steam approximates 100% efficiency as stack losses are little changed by this practice. Alternatively, on certain gas turbines, steam surplus to process requirements can be injected into the gas turbine itself, significantly increasing the power output from the machine at little capital cost - but at the operating cost of losing the water to atmosphere in the turbine exhaust. Combined Cycles Alternatively, surplus steam from a gas turbine/HRSG system can be utilised in a condensing steam turbine as in normal power station practice, to generate additional power. This so called "Combined Cycle" operation can yield a fuel efficiency to power of better than 50%, substantially better than the best of coal-fired generating systems. Bottoming Cycles Here waste heat is captured for process use and the residual utilised to power a turbine. This cycle is relatively uncommon, but does occasionally arise in metallurgical or chemical processes where there is considerable heat of reaction. While the power output is useful, the efficiency of bottoming cycles is typically low. BENEFITS OF COGENERATION Compared with purchased electricity and boilers to produce steam, cogeneration requires considerable additional investment. This additional investment may be rewarded, and cogeneration will be economic, when:
While economics may be the prime driver from the users point of view, cogeneration offers substantial additional benefits to the community:
Of course, it needs also to be recognised that gas turbine cogeneration consumes gas, which is a relatively scarce resource compared with coal. COGENERATION PROJECT ARRANGEMENTS Small scale cogeneration facilities may be owned, operated and financed by the energy host organisation. Then relatively simple economic evaluation and investment approval processes can be used. Specialist cogeneration companies exist who can assist with evaluation, equipment selection and operation of cogeneration facilities. The fuel supplier, and electrical energy supply authority will also be involved in providing tariff information and scoping and evaluating the project, and agreeing arrangements for purchase of any excess power supplied into the grid, and for sale of supplementary or stand-by requirements from the grid. Large scale projects with shared users and substantial electricity sales are much more complex. The evaluation, technology selection, approval, financing and operating arrangements are all quite complex, with many different possibilities. The relationships between the many different parties have to be defined in contractual agreements, which need to provide for all kinds of future possibilities. Even the economic evaluation is difficult to define at present, with a wide range of future power and fuel prices suggested by different "experts". A large cogeneration facility will involve at least the following parties and agreements:
|